The experiment here is clear but
vague simultaneously. Readers understand the gist but are left out of the
particulars. The language is excellent and so much is said in so few words. The
repetition serves to bolster the idea of memory, but I found it unnecessary,
especially the mention of her being “old” when such a vivid image was painted
for readers just prior to that statement. The woman sees “The Memory Book” and
her zest for life is renewed, but we are unsure what exactly she sees, besides
a photo of her father. I wonder if perhaps the photo could be left even more
ambiguous, so that the readers fills in the gaps with their own experiences, a
mention of something both wonderful and horrible, but a change in the ending
might be necessary. At the end she sees her father, which then brings a lot of
questions She is old, so presumably he is even older or merely a figment of her
imagination. Was her vigor removed because of a happy memory or the memory of
what she survived? She falls out of a window, startling since it wasn’t
previously mentioned that she was even on a story higher than the first. There
is also a conflict with how the mouse seems to enter so casually “from outside”
when she is on a floor higher than the first. But I did like how the mouse
leads to the rest of the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment