Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Glossolalia Critique
The
first thing I noticed was that Lewis’ identity is hidden in the first mention
of “they”. I don’t see the purpose in this and wonder if it was intentional.
However, I do like the change in referral to Charlie as Chuck when Lewis is
speaking to him. This makes me wonder how “Chuck” feels about his nickname.
Their knowledge of the bar makes me wonder how old they are and makes it hard
to visualize them. Lewis seems to narrate the story like a long yarn. I think
this feeling of exaggeration and suspense could be more incorporated into his
character. I like the experiment of a story within a story, but I think the
inner level of story is sort of glossed over. For instance, there’s the line
“tried clawing a bull’s face off” which raises a lot of questions. Is it a
literal bull? What train was he hopping on that had a bull? Wasn’t that
dangerous? Did he get hurt or maimed? I also kind of wonder how the rest of the
customers at the bar reacted to this, since he was apparently a regular. I
wouldn’t sacrifice the last line spoken line for this, though. I would
recommend he ends the story with the reaction of the bar folk and then there’s
a pause in which he fishes and says “What I’ll remember about him is how he
finished his stories…” And then work in the ending dialogue which worked well.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment