I think the experiment is very
clear here in the literal overlap of past and present. I wonder if the line
could some how be blurred a bit more. I really like the ending, although I saw
it coming. I am curious about the exact period of the Verdermaines’, which could
easily be remedied. I also want to know what happened to Amelie’s first child
to survive birth. The shift in time periods is very clear, which is good.
However, the inquiries at the end are only partially answered, which is
disappointing. Amelie seems to have an interesting relationship with her
daughter, as describing Patrice as “the child” seems detached but she remembers
their time together fondly. Simultaneously, she wishes the child had never been
born. Charles seems the epitome of the present, with his finger on the pulse of
society as a journalist. Part of me is curious about whether his apartment is a
modern style or some sort of imitation of older architecture, which might be
something to play with. I wonder if there could be more ties to him and the
Verdermaines. The implication at the end is that the discovery of the coffin,
though not disturbing to him (which it might be to most people—something else
about Charles I’m curious about) left a lasting impression and he will most
likely write about it. Yet, curious as he is, he does not inspect the coffin
out of respect, which is somewhat understandable.
No comments:
Post a Comment