Monday, January 21, 2013

S.O.S. Critique


To start, I enjoyed the title. This piece is very detailed, sometimes oddly so. In some places it works and makes the piece a little more real but other times it distracts from the piece, as it is unnecessary and adds nothing. For example, the mention of the leaves on the tree never falling seems slightly eerie, but doesn’t create any suspense about the stranger (not to mention, he’s only been on the island for 3 months and the season wasn’t mentioned). However, small hints in the writing of the disorientation of the men on the island are very immersive in their mindsets. There was some trouble with the past and present in certain sentences, which I marked.
The format of the piece was a little confusing. I understand why the names were placed at the end but once I forgot who was speaking and wondered why they mentioned the footprints twice. I wonder what form the reader is supposed to assume- are these letters? Are they written to someone? Would first person better accomplish the ending.
I loved the twist and did not see it coming at all. At the same time, I’m curious about the personality split- could this have been prompted by some head trauma? Could one mention a bloodied rock where he awoke after hitting his head when he appeared on the island? It seems odd that Peter recognized the clothes while “James” doesn’t but I would grant a willing suspension of disbelief. Could there be more behind “James’” compulsive sorting? Overall, I enjoyed this piece very much and would love to read more.

No comments:

Post a Comment